baudillard’s simulacra, hologram psychoanalytic film philosophy. “The film that’s lost its philosophy”, more like the medium that’s lost its mediacy. When everything is hyperreal, one enters the impossible by killing one’s own clone, yet the impossible can only be the impossible which is a point that Nolan clearly failed to realize. In Nolan’s world it matters whether we can or cannot distinguish “reality” from “imaginary” at the end of a film, but then again how’s that educational goal even achievable in a medium that’s immediate in and for itself?
字數太多了
© 著作權歸作者所有
近期熱門文章(Popular Articles)
該作者其它文章(Other Articles)
我的耳膜不會忘記這部電影
很多靜置的鏡頭中精心放置了前景和後景,始終存在的是某種靜物作為一個corpse,其他厲害的鏡頭設計技法較為老舊,不過整體上是用大特寫和硬光嚇人的那種驚悚。諷刺的是伯格曼因為自己的fetish原因始終沒有安排兩個persona做愛,卻 ...