.....................谈话选集
On today's market, we find a whole series of products deprived of their malignant property: cream without fat, beer without alcohol, decaffeinated coffee, virtual sex (sex without sex), warfare without casualties. What we encounter, is precisely Lacan's reversal of the famous Dostoyevsky model, "If God doesn't exist, everything is permitted. If God doesn' t exist, everything is prohibited." You are allowed to have a full life of happiness and pleasure. But to be happy, you should avoid dangerous excesses. So at the end, everything is prohibited. You cannot eat fat or have coffee -- you cannot have anything in order to enjoy. So today's hedonism combines pleasure with constraint. It's not the old notion of the right measure between pleasure and constraint. It's more of a coincidence of the two extremes. There is only one possible explanation: enjoyment itself, which we experience as "transgression", is in its innermost status something imposed, ordered - when we enojoy, we never do it spontaneously, we always follow a certian injunction. Enjoy, is Superego.
是否所有的事物都以因果链条相连？一切存在之物是否都受充足理由律的支配？终极的事件正是堕落本身，亦即失去那个从未存在过的原初和谐于统一状态的过程。我在过剩与事物中迷失。
起初，我不认可社会运作系统，处于抑郁无力的状态。可是，成年人就是要进入这场游戏，于是我从抑郁状态走入焦虑状态，陷入游戏规则、意义价值、效率和享乐、人生苦短，什么是重要的漩涡。
